Legal Opinion
In re Disbarment of Hudson
California Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1894No. 21102PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Application to the Supreme Court for the disbarment of an attorney. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Application for removal from the office of attorney.
A document entitled “ Accusation” has been presented by H. A. McCraney, in which he alleges certain facts against the above-named Rodney J. Hudson on information and belief, and prays that said Hudson be removed from the office of attorney and counselor at law. The “Accusation” is also supported by the oath of McCraney in the following form:
“State of California, ) “ City and County of San Francisco. Í
“H. A. McCraney, being first duly sworn,deposes and says that he is the affiant in the foregoing affidavit and accusation, that he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bold v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lassen v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- In re WeedMontana Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.