Legal Opinion

Radloff v. General Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 15, 1988No. 87-2053PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Farmers Insurance Exchange appeals from an order declaring that it lost its subrogation rights in the settlement proceeds Darlene and Gregory Radloff received on their claims arising out of an automobile accident. The Radloffs brought an action against the adverse driver and his insurance company and joined Farmers as a party defendant, as required by sec. 803.03(2)(a), Stats., because of Farmers’ subrogation rights. The issue is whether Farmers lost its rights by failing to exercise one of the three options specified in sec. 803.03(2)(b). We hold that the trial court did not abuse its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. TollefsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Interest of IVCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. St. John Vianney School v. Board of Education of School District of JanesvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GarberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Fischer v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sampson v. LogueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Fischer v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  5. Holman v. Family Health PlanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API