Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.
These are motions to confirm and to vacate an award of arbitrators directing respondent corporation to restore petitioner ' ‘ as manager in charge of production and engineering in accordance with the terms of the employment agreement dated November 1, 1954”. The contract between the parties, expiring December 31,1965, provides: “If Staklinski [petitioner], for a period of three (3) months, has been unable to substantially attend to his duties and the affairs of the company, the Board of Directors shall meet, at the expiration of such period, to determine whether the disability is permanent *708or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Publishers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In Re the Arbitration Between United Culinary Bar & Grill Employees, Local 923New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Burkin & KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between LandersmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Matter of DeveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton Life Insurance Company of New York v. Republic National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Samincorp South American Minerals & Merchandise Corp. & Tikvah Mining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- In re the Arbitration between Astey & SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1959