Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Samincorp South American Minerals & Merchandise Corp. & Tikvah Mining Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.
Petitioner applies pursuant to 7510 Civil Practice Law and Buies for an order confirming an award in arbitration and pursuant to 7514 (subd. [a]), for entry of judgment thereon. Bespondent contests the jurisdiction of this court over the subject matter and over the foreign corporation.
The facts in the present controversy are undisputed. Petitioner, a New York corporation and respondent, a foreign corporation not doing business in New York, entered into a contract in writing, which provided that: “ Any difference under this contract is to be settled by arbitration under the rules of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re I/s Stavborg (O. H. Meling, Manager) v. National Metal Converters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Hamilton Life Insurance Company of New York v. Republic National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Joseph L. Wilmotte & Co. v. Rosenman Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Beckman v. Greentree Securities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wappingers Central School District v. Wappingers Congress of TeachersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.