Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Landersman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of Special Term unanimously modified insofar as it granted a stay against the corporation from proceeding with the arbitration and the motion in respect to the corporation denied and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants. The corporation is bound by the preineorporation agreement (Morgan v. Bon Bon Go., 222 N. Y. 22, 27; Jermyn v. Searing, 225 N. Y. 525, 538; Matter of Super Trading Co., 22 F. 2d 480, 482). The issues proposed are arbitrable. (Martocci v. Martocci, 42 N. Y. S. 2d 222, affd. 266 App. Div. 840; Matter of Carl [Weissman], 263…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morgan v. . Bon Bon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Jermyn v. . SearingNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re the Election of Officers & Directors of Allied Fruit & Extract Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Burkin & KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Burkin & KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Crandall v. Master-Eagle Photoengraving Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960