Legal Opinion
Matter of Devery
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ. RIPPEY, CONWAY and THACHER, JJ., dissent on the ground that the question submitted to arbitration was the obligation of the employer to continue Cody as a truck driver and that it did not embrace the question whether Cody should be continued in employment in any capacity compatible with his physical condition, whereby he might earn at least a union helper's rate of pay.
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Ruppert & EgelhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958