Legal Opinion
Bruchman v. Standard Chartered Bank, PLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 17, 1998No. 95 CIV. 0022(PKL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Geo. B. Zaloom & Co., Inc. (“Zaloom”) and Wally Bruchman (together, “plaintiffs”) bring this action against Standard Chartered Bank, PLC (“SCB”), for fraudulent concealment in connection with two commercial transactions. Zaloom also claims against SCB under U.C.C. § 4-103(5), for failure to pay certain documentary drafts in a timely manner. Pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, SCB moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claims. SCB also moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) to strike the affidavits of four witnesses offered by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Veronice A. Holt v. Kmi-Continental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Montefiore Medical Center v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Gould Paper Corp. v. Madisen Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Wahad v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998