Doll v. Chicago Title Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiffs James and Aimee Doll, on behalf of themselves and numerous potential class members, have brought contract and tort claims against defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title). Plaintiffs’ claims are based on their allegation that Chicago Title, in acting as plaintiffs’ closing agent in a real estate refinancing, collected and retained an amount for recording fees in excess of the actual fees paid by Chicago Title for recording plaintiffs’ mortgage and release. Plaintiffs’ motion for class…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langston v. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- McNamara v. HallinanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019