Eureste v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

OPINION

GUZMAN, Justice.

Bernardo Eureste appeals the trial court’s judgment suspending him from the practice of law for three years — two years active suspension and one year probated suspension. In five issues, Eureste contends: (1) the judgment is void because the trial judge failed to take the appropriate oath; (2) the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the judgment; and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in imposing punishment. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Eureste is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas since 1990. During the relevant time period, his…