Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v. Franco

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1998No. 97-0989PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Per curiam

Is wrongful termination of employment so extreme and outrageous that, without more, it will support a jury finding of intentional infliction of emotional distress? The court of appeals held that it is. 1 It is not. Furthermore, the respondents’ punitive damages cannot stand without the intentional-infliction claim. But, the court of appeals’ judgment is correct to the extent that it affirmed the trial court’s order reinstating Odilia Franco. Further, there is no error in that portion of the judgment reversing and remanding the trial court’s order of attorney’s fees for Franco. We reverse,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Intercontinental Group Partnership v. KB Home Lone Star L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. LowTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Tiller v. McLureTexas Supreme Court · 2003

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API