Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Insurance Co. v. Functional Restoration Associates

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 98-0479PublishedCited by 304 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Abbott

in which Justice ENOCH, Justice BAKER, Justice HANKINSON and Justice O’NEILL joined, and in Part III of which Justice GONZALES joined.

In this case we determine whether Continental Casualty Insurance Co. (“Continental”) is entitled to judicial review of a medical benefits decision by the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s Hearings Division. The trial court dismissed Continental’s suit for want of jurisdiction. The court of appeals reversed, holding that although the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act does not confer a statutory right to judicial review of medical benefits disputes,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by304 opinions

  1. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2010

299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API