Legal Opinion
Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1984No. 83-142PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
The planning and zoning code for the village of Hudson is contained in Part Twelve of the village’s Codified Ordinances. The specific portion of Part Twelve which concerns the instant appeal is Chapter 1204.
Section 1204.03 of that chapter creates an Architectural and Historic Board of Review. The function of that body is set forth in Section 1204.01:
“(a) Generally. The Architectural and Historic Board of Review hereinafter created shall serve to protect and preserve the value, appearance and use of property on which buildings are constructed or altered, to maintain a high character of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Brown v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Gerijo, Inc. v. City of FairfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Roy v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. Village of LodiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.