Kirkpatrick v. Harvey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action upon a judgment. The complaint, which was filed on December 29, 1939, alleged that on November 28, 1934, the plaintiff’s assignor recovered judgment against this defendant in the sum of $5,539.57. The answer set up as a separate defense that the judgment sued upon was a joint judgment against this defendant and her husband; that such judgment was recovered in an action upon a promissory note signed by this husband and wife and secured by. a deed of trust on real property; that the money was borrowed for the benefit of the community and the trust deed given was upon community…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. City Cab & Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Bimrose v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Helpling v. HelplingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Woehrle v. CancliniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hartson v. DillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Woolley v. SeijoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.