Hartson v. Dill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action for damages for the alleged wrongful diversion of water, and to quiet title to rights asserted to the use thereof.
Judgment went for the defendants in the trial court, and this appeal is from said judgment and an order denying the motion of plaintiff for a new trial.
The waters involved are those of the Susan River in Lassen County. A portion of the waters of that river leave the main channel and pass down what is known as the “Dill” and “Van Noten” sloughs to their junction, where they form what is known as the Big Slough. The waters flowing into said Big Slough are taken…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kirkpatrick v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hanley v. MostWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934