Legal Opinion

Ketola v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 1955No. Nos. 36,708, 36,713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Motion by defendant-appellant to remand to the district court of Ramsey county for the purpose of enabling defendant to renew a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, not discovered during the trial below but since the appeal.

This court has jurisdiction to remand a case in order to enable appellant to renew his motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence arising since the appeal. Kroning v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 96 Minn. 128, 104 N. W. 888; Jensen v. Fischer, 132 Minn. 475, 157 N. W. 498; Fyfe v. G. N. Ry. Co. 222 Minn. 490, 25 N. W. (2d)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kroning v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Jensen v. FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Fyfe v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. NoriegaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API