State, by Peterson v. Anderson

Pee Curiam.

Appellant moves that we remand this cause to the trial court so as to permit a hearing upon his motion for amended findings or, if that be denied, that he be permitted to move the court to make its memorandum a part - of the order here for review, the memorandum not having been made a part of it. In this behalf appellant claims that the facts “are practically without dispute”; hence if the court makes findings of fact and conclusions of law, in accordance with statutory requirements (2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9311), there is little, if any, likelihood that a transcript need be…