State v. Noriega
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
This case is presently pending in this Court on the defendant’s appeal from a conviction of obstructing justice. No briefs have been filed because the defendant has filed a motion for remand to the Superior Court to enable him to move for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
Appended to the motion for remand are two affidavits. The affidavit of a potential witness, Mr. Padilla, who was not available at the time of trial, sets forth the substance of the testimony he would give were a new trial ordered. The affidavit of appellate counsel is to the effect that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Gregory ComuladaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Daniel Smith, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. ChurtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State of Arizona v. Andres SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023