Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1916No. 19,899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Motion by the plaintiff, the appellant, to remand to the -district court to enable him to renevi a motion for a new trial upon the ground of new evidence discovered since the appeal.

This court has jurisdiction to remand a case to enable the appellant to renew his motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence arising since the appeal. Kroning v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 96 Minn. 128, 104 N. W. 888.

In determining whether a motion to remand should be granted we are limited to an inquiry whether the showing made is such that the moving party -should have the opportunity to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kroning v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Fyfe v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Ketola v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Brown v. BertrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Gibson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API