Legal Opinion

Clevenger v. Crosby & Mooney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1923No. 11011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.

On May 15, 1918, Crosby & Mooney, plaintiffs, commenced this action in the district court of Mayes county, Oklahoma, against Ed Clevenger, defendant, in replevin, to recover possession of 27 cows branded “Circle J” of the alleged value of $1,620. The petition of, the plain,i:fs alleged a general ownership of ihe property, and that they purchased the cattle from Otis R. Cureton on the-day of December, 1917, and obtained from Cureton a bill of sale for the cattle on said date. The defendant filed an answer consisting of a gren'eral denial to Hie allegations of .ihe plaintiffs’ petition.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Haddock v. Sticelber MongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. GouldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Holland v. Scheruble Heating, Plumbing & Repair ShopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hoffman Bros. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. T. M. Dover Mercantile Co v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. HoeferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API