Legal Opinion
Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George Decarlo, Dotster, Inc., and afternic.com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 21, 2002No. 00-4556PublishedCited by 475 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Darrell J. Bird, an Ohio citizen proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit alleging various violations of federal copyright and trademark law against Afternic.com, Inc., Dotster, Inc., George DeCario, Marshall Parsons, and Steven Vincent. Dotster, DeCario, and Vincent are citizens of Washington, Afternic has its headquarters in New York, and Parsons resides in California. Bird’s allegations involve the defendants’ activities in connection with the registration and attempted sale of the Internet website “efinancia.com.” All defendants except Parsons filed motions to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by475 opinions
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Tamburo v. DworkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Air Products & Controls, Inc. v. Safetech International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Shrader v. BiddingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
470 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.