Legal Opinion

State v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1903No. 13,796PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Geeene, J. :

J.T. Clark sought to enjoin the city of Topeka from purchasing a system of water-works subject to an encumbrance not payable for more than twenty years, and from issuing its bonds in payment of such water-works subject to the encumbrance. The cause was tried in the court below upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. The injunction was denied and the plaintiff prosecutes error. After the cause was submitted to this court the parties agreed that the state be made plaintiff, and the proceedings were so amended and the state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Browne v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Gordon v. State ex rel. BoderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  3. Ironwood Water-works Co. v. TrebilcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Leavenworth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Utah Savings & Trust Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. ErnestiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Gayman, County Treasurer v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Sebern v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API