Legal Opinion
Chotapeg, Inc. v. Bullowa
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
This action was commenced on January 25, 1941. The second amended complaint, in which plaintiff sues for damages arising from violation of a statute only, is before the court on this appeal. No answer has been interposed. The only question raised is whether or not the complaint upon its face states a cause of action.
Plaintiff alleges that the parties owned adjoining properties on which buildings stood with a common party wall between them; that defendant wrongfully neglected and failed to bend over the anchors at the beam ends and to brick in all open beam holes in the standing party wall, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Amberg v. . KinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Racine v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Pine Grove Poultry Farm, Inc. v. Newtown By-Products Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Runkel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Salzano v. First National Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Wax NJ-2, LLC v. JFB Construction & DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.