Legal Opinion

Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1926PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hiscock, Ch. J.

This appeal involves a challenge to the sufficiency of the complaint. The substantial and pertinent allegations of that pleading are to the effect that the plaintiff, a dealer in groceries, oils, etc., purchased from an intermediate wholesale dealer certain containers of olive oil which had been put up and sold by the defendant; that the latter had placed a label upon each container representing that it contained one-fourth of a gallon of such oil whereas the contents were actually less than that amount; that plaintiff made his purchases in reliance upon this label and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Brown v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API