Legal Opinion

Fowlkes v. Ingraham

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1947No. Civ. 13579PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Respondent (plaintiff below) moves to dismiss the appeal. The action was one against the administratrix of á decedent’s estate for $3,835. The case was tried to a jury which brought in a verdict for plaintiff for $1,500. After the jury was discharged and while the attorneys for both parties were still in the courtroom both attorneys stated that so far as they were concerned the case was finished. Four diamond rings had been introduced into evidence and the trial judge stated to counsel for both parties that since they had both expressed the opinion that nothing further was to be done in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Witaschek v. WitaschekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Redsted v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Wuest v. WuestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API