Legal Opinion

State v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 27, 1985No. A-531PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

The state has petitioned for review of an order suppressing Intoximeter results in forty-four cases of driving while intoxicated, AS 28.35.033. We find that we must remand these cases to the district court.

In Anchorage v. Serrano, 649 P.2d 256, 258 (Alaska App.1982), we concluded that due process “requires the prosecution to make reasonable efforts to preserve a breath sample or to take other steps to allow a defendant to verify the results of the breathalyzer test” in those cases in which it wishes to admit the results of a breath test.

The state subsequently began…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  2. People v. Jones, New York County Courts1983
  3. Best v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  5. Klepzig v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  2. Best v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Begley v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Swanson v. City & Borough of JuneauCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  5. Ansay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API