Legal Opinion

Klepzig v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 29, 1983No. 6936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

In Municipality of Anchorage v. Serrano, 649 P.2d 256 (Alaska App.1982), this court held that in cases involving a charge of driving while intoxicated:

the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution requires the prosecution to make reasonable efforts to preserve a breath sample or to take other steps to allow a defendant to verify the results of the breathalyzer test.

Id. at 258 (footnote omitted). In this case we affirm the ruling of the trial judge that the defendant, Rodney Klepzig, forfeited his right to have a breath sample preserved.

Klepzig was involved in a traffic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. Swensen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  2. State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Begley v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Babb v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  5. State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API