Legal Opinion
Connell v. Bernstein-Macauley, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 6, 1975No. Nos. 72 Civ. 3272 (W.K.), 73 Civ. 4136 (M.E.F.), 74 Civ. 391 (E.W.) and 74 Civ. 2426 (E.W.)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Defendants Shearson Hayden Stone Inc., Bernstein-Macauley, Inc., Roger S. Berlind and Sanford I. Weill (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Hayden Stone defendants) have moved1 for an order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 42 *113(a), consolidating the following actions for trial:
Connell v. Bernstein-Macauley, Inc., 72 Civ. 3272 (WK) (“Connell”); Taylor v. Bernstein-Macauley, Inc., 73 Civ. 4136 (M.E.F.) (“Taylor”); United States Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund, Inc. v. Orenstein, 74 Civ. 391 (E.W.) (“U. S. Steel”); The 65 Security Plan Pension…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Goodman v. NeffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Moore v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- W.R. Grace & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- E. F. Hutton & Co. v. Jupiter Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Oliner v. McBride's Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Blais Construction Co. v. Hanover Square Associates-IDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.