Legal Opinion

Joint School District No. 7 of the Brighton v. Kemen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1887PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Kenosha County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

'Lyon, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing the plaintiffs complaint, with costs, for non-compliance with an order theretofore made in the cause requiring the plaintiff to file security for costs. The appeal was taken and perfected before the posts were taxed and inserted in the judgment. It was therefore prematurely taken, and must be dismissed. Smith v. Hart, 44 Wis. 230, and cases cited; Haseltine v. Simpson, 61 Wis. 427; Hoye v. C. & H. W. R. Co. 65 Wis. 243; Ballou v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 53 Wis. 150.

If the case is within the provisions of ch. 202, Laws of 1882…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Haseltine v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Johannes v. YoungsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Smith v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hoye v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Persons v. SimonsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Richardson v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Puhr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Netherton v. HoltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API