Legal Opinion

Puhr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from orders of the circuit court for Manitowoc county: Michael Kirwan, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKerwin, J.

This action was brought to recover damages resulting from a collision' between an automobile owned by Frank Kucera, deceased, and a train of the defendant railway company, which occurred at a crossing at Two Rivers in the county of Manitowoc, Wisconsin.

The deceased, Frank Kucera, and wife, deceased, Frank Bauman and wife, and Theresa, daughter of Frank Bau-man, were riding in an automobile, Bauman, his wife, and daughter having been invited to ride by Frank Kucera, deceased. All were killed in the collision except Theresa Bau-man, who was severely injured.

The action was brought by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Egaard v. DahlkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larson v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mitler v. Associated Contractors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Witzko v. KoenigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Will of PattisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Walford v. BartschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API