Legal Opinion

United States v. Weissman

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 14, 2006No. 1:05CR225PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Defendants, Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, are charged in a superseding indictment with one count of conspiring to communicate national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(d), (e) and (g). More specifically, Count One of the superseding indictment, which spans twelve pages and includes fifty-seven overt acts, alleges that between April 1999 and continuing until August 2004, Rosen and Weissman along with alleged co-conspirator Lawrence Franklin, then an employee of the Department of Defense…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Barry HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohammad HassanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. United States v. MubayyidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  4. United States v. Abu-JihaadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
  5. United States v. RosenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API