Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bertram Zweibon v. John N. Mitchell, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 24, 1975No. 73-1847PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Dissent

*601Circuit Judge J. SKELLY WRIGHT,

in an opinion joined by Circuit Judges LEYENTHAL and SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, and by Chief Judge BAZELON except as to Part III — B, concerning which he filed a dissenting opinion, concluded that:

1. In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), the Supreme Court held that a federal cause of action for damages exists to remedy violations of the Fourth Amendment. The warrant-less surveillance conducted by appellees constitutes such a Fourth Amendment violation. Infra, 170…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Honorable Ronald v. Dellums v. James M. Powell, Chief, United States Capitol Police, Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Forsyth v. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Pueblo v. DolceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1976
  5. United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API