Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Saks & Co. & Saks Fifth Avenue Women's Shoe Salespeople Committee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Breitel, J. P.

The union appeals from an order of Special Term granting the motion of Saks & Company, the employer, to stay arbitration pursuant to a demand made under a collective bargaining agreement. The underlying dispute relates to whether one Harry Share, a member of the union and an employee of Saks, is entitled both to severance pay and to pension benefits.

Because the employer’s pension plan is, by its terms, one administered and interpreted exclusively by the pension committee set up under the plan, Special Term held that the dispute was not subject to arbitration. An opposite result…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of General Elec. Co. (Elec., Etc., Workers)New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. In re the Arbitration between Teschner & LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. In re the Arbitration between Teschner & LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. In re the Arbitration between Lloyd & A. Hollander & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration Between George Rattray & Co. & TrenzNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API