In re the Arbitration between Teschner & Livingston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.
Petitioner, an individual engaged in a small business, whose only employee was a shipping clerk, entered into a collective bargaining agreement with respondent union containing a sweeping arbitration clause, as well as the following provision: “ The Employer shall have the absolute right to go out of business at any time during the term of this agreement and such right shall not be questioned by the Union. Upon such event, all employees employed more than six months, shall receive two weeks pay.”
Two months later, allegedly because of poor business conditions, petitioner surrendered his store…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re the Arbitration between Compagnie Francaise des Petroles & Pantepec Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- In re the Arbitration between Potoker & Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62New York Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Arbitration between General Warehousemen's Union & Glidden Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Camhi & Undergarment & Negligee Workers Union, Local 62Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.