Legal Opinion

Matter of General Elec. Co. (Elec., Etc., Workers)

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A collective bargaining agreement between the union and the company provides for arbitration of disputes over the application or interpretation of any of its provisions. The contract also contains the usual prohibition of company discrimination against an employee because of union activity. Under another collective agreement the company pays each employee who serves as a union representative in adjusting grievances or negotiating with management for a maximum of eight hours per week. For all time spent upon union activity beyond that maximum the union pays the employee at his normal rate. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Engineers Association v. Sperry Gyroscope Company, Division of Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. International Union of Electrical Workers v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Davenport v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Local 201, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  5. Pari-Mutuel Employees' Guild v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API