Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration Between George Rattray & Co. & Trenz
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meter, J.
By this motion petitioner seeks a stay pursuant to section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act of respondent union’s demand for arbitration of nine stated questions. Prior to July, 1957 George Battray & Company, Inc., was an independent company engaged in the manufacture of potentiometers. On that date all of the outstanding stock of the company was purchased by Hardwick, Hindle, Inc. The employees and the union were advised of the changed relationship. The pre-existing collective bargaining agreement with respondent union had been extended for two years in June, 1957, and the business activities…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- North Ferry Co. v. Local 333, United Marine DivisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004