Legal Opinion

Short v. Stuyvesant Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1935No. Civ. No. 9890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this suit for malicious prosecution and at the conclusion of the evidence the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for defendant insurance company. From judgment entered thereon plaintiff appeals.

Defendant had issued a policy for $3,000 covering plaintiff’s household furniture. Shortly after it had been moved to a new address a fire broke out which had definite appearance of being of incendiary origin and which destroyed most of the furniture. Plaintiff submitted proof of loss to the company, including a claim for a grand piano, which she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Davis v. PezelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bonamy v. ZenoffNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Donaldson v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API