Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1937No. 6450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellant instituted this action seeking the recovery of damages for an alleged malicious prosecution.

The record discloses that appellant and his son went upon a strip of land ten feet wide bordering the Hazel Miller property, there cut into wood certain trees which had partially blown down and removed the wood therefrom. While appellant and .his son were so engaged respondent Schwasinger came to them and advised them to return it immediately. The following morning appellant talked with respondent Mrs. Miller, advising her he owned the strip of land, having acquired it through condemnation,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. LeClear v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. King v. Apple River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Shea v. Cloquet Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. FeltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Allen v. MoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Thomas v. HintonIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Rowles v. Country Kitchen International, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Howard v. FeltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API