Legal Opinion

Davis v. Pezel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1933No. Docket No. 7713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

On July 1, 1930, a judgment was obtained in the superior court by plaintiff against defendant for the sum of $1,000 for malicious prosecution. Motions for nonsuit and for a directed verdict were made by defendant and denied by the court. The defendant appeals and treats his grounds of appeal under four divisions, which will hereinafter be treated separately as presented in his opening brief.

The facts upon which the action is based are as follows: On the fourteenth day of July, 1929, appellant, as an automobile merchant, sold respondent a second-hand automobile on the usual installment plan,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Stinson Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Melvin v. SimingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davies v. LanginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Newman v. First California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Short v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API