Legal Opinion

Western Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 20, 1885No. 227PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE OIECUIT COURT OK THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OK CONNECTICUT. The case was a suit in equity, brought by the appellant, the Western Electric Manufacturing Company, against the Ansonia Brass and Copper Conypany to, restrain the infringement of two reissued letters patent, numbered 6,954 and 6,955 respectively, granted to the appellant as the assignee of Joseph Olm-stead, both dated February 29, 1876, for improvements in insulating telegraph wires.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE OIECUIT COURT OK THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OK CONNECTICUT. The case was a suit in equity, brought by the appellant, the Western Electric Manufacturing Company, against the Ansonia Brass and Copper Conypany to, restrain the infringement of two reissued letters patent, numbered 6,954 and 6,955 respectively, granted to the appellant as the assignee of Joseph Olm-stead, both dated February 29, 1876, for improvements in insulating telegraph wires. The reissues are divisions of original letters patent No. 129,858, dated July 23, 1872. The descriptive specifications of .the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

He stated the facts in the foregoing language, and continued :

It is clear that the two patents must stand or fall together. If the patent for the process is invalid so-must be the patent for the product. What we have to say will refer to the process patent.

The alleged invention described in the patent is not for insulating telegraph wires, for that art long antedated the original patent. The specification disclaims as a part of the invention the braiding of a fibrous covering over the wire, and then dipping it in wax for the purpose of filling and closing the pores, and the subsequent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Railroad Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Vinton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Grant v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  4. Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  5. Hemming Mfg. Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API