Legal Opinion

Railroad Co. v. Mellon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 25, 1881No. 21PublishedCited by 56 opinions

ApPEAL-from the Circuit Court of the,United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On Oct. 2, 1866, letters-patent No. 58,447 were granted to Edward Mellon for an improvement in the mode .of attaching tires tdp the wheels of locomotives. For the purpose of illas-' tration, three figures, numbered respectively 1, 2, and 3, were appended to the specification on which the application for the letters was based.

Read the full summary

ApPEAL-from the Circuit Court of the,United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On Oct. 2, 1866, letters-patent No. 58,447 were granted to Edward Mellon for an improvement in the mode .of attaching tires tdp the wheels of locomotives. For the purpose of illas-' tration, three figures, numbered respectively 1, 2, and 3, were appended to the specification on which the application for the letters was based. The specification is as follows: — “ Figures 1 and 2 are central sections of a locomotive wheel having a tire applied to it according to my invention. Figure' 8, a section of a…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

It appears from the evidence that railroad locomotive wheels are composed of two parts, — the body of the wheel, called the wheel-centre, and a tire which .surrounds it, substantially in the same manner in which the, tire surrounds the felloes of an ordinary wagon wheel.

The invention of Mellon relates solely to a method of fastening tires upon locomotive wheel-centres. It appears from the record that, generally speaking, there are two ways of fastening these tires upon their wheel-centres ; one by making the tire a little. smaller in diameter than the wheel-centre, then heating it so that it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burns v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Reece Button-Hole Ma. Co. v. Globe Button-Hole Ma. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  5. Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API