Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Burford
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1968No. Civ. No. 753PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
Pending questions in the present Miller estate appeals (see Estate of Miller, ante p. 536 [66 Cal.*556Rptr. 756]) involve the query why the costs awarded by this court in both of the preceding appeals (Estate of Miller, 212 Cal.App.2d 284 [27 Cal.Rptr. 909] and Estate of Miller, 230 Cal.App.2d 888 [41 Cal.Rptr. 410]) have not been realized by Miriam Miller Hartman, notwithstanding the direction in each of the opinions that she should recover her costs and that none of the items in either of her cost bills was attacked by the respondents, heirs or distributees therein.
In Estate of Miller, numbered…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Estate of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ramirez v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hartman v. BurfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968