Legal Opinion
McCrocklin v. Employment Development Department
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1984No. B001255PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Robert Earl McCrocklin appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate. The sole issue is whether McCrocklin left his employment “voluntarily without good cause” under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. We conclude that he did leave for good cause, and therefore reverse the judgment.
McCrocklin asserts that his departure was justified because his employer should not have forced him to work in “an inadequately-ventilated noisy space reeking of tobacco smoke.” The Employment Development Department (EDD), an administrative law judge, the California…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Zorrero v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Shimp v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Rabago v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quirk v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Moore v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985