Legal Opinion
Moore v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 1985No. D001757PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Lawrence V. Moore and Walter F. Whelan, Jr., appeal from an order denying their petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to set aside a decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board) denying them unemployment compensation benefits on the ground they were discharged for misconduct under Unemployment Insurance Code 1 section 1256. They contend the evidentiary record does not support the trial court’s findings of misconduct, but shows their refusal to work was based upon a good-faith, reasonable fear for their safety within the workplace. They also urge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Portland Cement Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Zorrero v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peery v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Paratransit, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Indian Springs, Ltd. v. Palm Desert Rent Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987