Legal Opinion

Barker v. Ackers

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1938No. Civ. 11533PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This action Avas commenced January 9, 1933, by the plaintiffs as members of a committee of noteholders allegedly owning and holding $666,000 principal sum of the Pickwick Corporation 6%% Collateral Trust Gold Notes (hereinafter referred to as the “notes”), against defendants *165as individual stockholders in the Pickwick Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “corporation”), to recover from the defendants on their stockholders’ liability.

For a clear understanding of the issues it is necessary to epitomize the facts, from which it appears that on December 13, 1929, the directors of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Home Owners' Etc. Corp. v. EngelbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Barker v. AckersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Funk v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Funk v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API