Legal Opinion

Norton v. Meyers

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6696PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LANDIS, J., pro tem.

This is an action on a promissory note in the sum of $2,185, given plaintiff as part of the consideration of his agreement to perform a building contract.

In her answer defendant alleges that by reason of the failure of plaintiff to complete the work within the time and as provided by the agreement the consideration for the note wholly failed, and in her cross-complaint asks damages against plaintiff in the sum of $2,925 for failure to perform the building contract and by reason of defective construction and material furnished by plaintiff.

The trial court found that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Myers v. CanepaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Jackson School District v. CulbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Throop v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kovacevich v. Fischer Motor Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Cabinet Works v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API