Legal Opinion
Myers v. Canepa
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1918No. Civ. No. 1493PublishedCited by 14 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The cause is before us on rehearing. The following statement of the case is taken from the original opinion, written by Justice Hart, affirming the judgment:
“The action was brought to recover judgment against the defendants for medical services rendered and for goods, wares, and merchandise furnished to them. After a jury trial and verdict, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of three hundred dollars, from which defendants prosecute this appeal on the judgment-roll alone.
“The fourth amended complaint is in two counts. In the first count it is alleged: That on the nineteenth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Dennis v. Crocker-Huffman Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Rooney v. Gray Bros.California Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shebley v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Semple v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Murdock v. MurdockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Miller v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Sledge v. StolzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.