Throop v. Weaver
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from the judgment.
Plaintiffs sued in equity to cancel a certain note which they alleged in their complaint they executed and delivered to the defendant on or about the twenty-first day of April, 1915. They averred that the principal amount was $1,060, bearing interest at seven per cent per annum, and becoming due on or before July 1, 1916. They alleged that the note was in negotiable form and, upon information and belief, averred that at the time of beginning of the action it was still in the possession and under the control of defendant. They also averred that said note…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of DamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Kovacevich v. Fischer Motor Body Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Diamond Match Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Norton v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ward v. McKinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929