Legal Opinion

State v. Richards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7223SC317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

All of defendants’ assignments of error relate to the court’s charge to the jury. It is a well established principle of law in this State that the charge of the court will be construed contextually, and segregated portions will not be held prejudicial error when the charge as a whole is free from any prejudice to the defendant. State v. Alexander, 279 N.C. 527, 184 S.E. 2d 274 (1971); State v. McWilliams, 277 N.C. 680, 178 S.E. 2d 476 (1971); State v. Hall, 267 N.C. 90, 147 S.E. 2d 548 (1966); State v. Gatling, 5 N.C. App. 536, 169 S.E. 2d 60 (1969), affirmed 275 N.C. 625, 170…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. GatlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EisenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API