Legal Opinion
United States v. William Trotter, in No. 75--1709, and Vincent Nuzzo. Appeal of Vincent Nuzzo, in No. 75--1710
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 12, 1976No. 75-1709, 75-1710PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before VAN DUSEN, ADAMS and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
The theft of 422 cases of Excedrin from an interstate shipment by motor carrier is the genesis of the criminal prosecution which is the subject of this appeal. Defendants William Trotter and Vincent Nuzzo were tried to a jury in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and convicted on. all three counts of an indictment charging (count I) conspiracy to steal and possess part of an interstate shipment of freight in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1971), 1 (count II) theft of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. CiampagliaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.