Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas Andretta
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 8, 1980No. 79-1912, 79-2381, 79-1956, 79-1913 and 79-2387PublishedCited by 209 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated appeals we are presented with challenges on numerous grounds to the convictions of Anthony Pro-venzano, Thomas Andretta, and Stephen Andretta under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962. 1 The defendants 2 were convicted by a jury at a joint trial of conspiracy to violate RICO and of substantive violations, and were sentenced to prison terms and fined. 3 We have determined that the district court made no errors at trial which would warrant reversal, and we therefore affirm the judgment of…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.